The Coaching Review Priorities section is a prioritised guide to the subject take. It brings the most important technique, sequencing and comparison findings to the top so the coach can work through the pitch in a sensible order rather than searching through raw telemetry.

Each priority is backed by the evidence already generated by the pipeline. The coach remains the decision-maker: Kineologist surfaces the pattern, the comparison and the severity; the coach decides how that evidence fits the athlete, session and training objective.

The Action Plan turns the prioritised findings into a structured plan of action. Instead of ending with a list of flags, the report groups the next coaching steps into practical objectives, what to re-check and which evidence should be reviewed again after an intervention or subsequent take.

This is intentionally advisory rather than prescriptive: it gives the coach a repeatable review structure while leaving technique decisions, athlete context and training strategy with the coach.

The final part of this focus area is the measured comparison. Kineologist can build a reference baseline from approved example takes, then compare the subject against that reference automatically. The comparison is not reduced to a vague “different from baseline” statement: TrackView exposes the timing and magnitude evidence behind the report.

Where appropriate, the coach can see whether an event occurred earlier or later, the difference in frames and seconds, and the corresponding magnitude difference. That makes the report traceable back to the movement evidence rather than asking the coach to accept a black-box conclusion.

The Full-Body Valgus Kinematic Profile combines lower-body, pelvis, trunk and throwing-arm evidence in one report. In this Liam take, the report surfaces the STRIDE authority, hip–shoulder separation, lead-knee position, pelvis and trunk behaviour, throwing-arm measures and the observed M-event sequence so the coach can see how the delivery is organised around the throwing-arm result.

The aim is to support a technical review of the movement pattern. It is a kinematic profile from recorded motion; it does not directly measure elbow load, UCL strain or injury probability.

Original comparison preserves the athlete's real timing differences. Phase-locked comparison aligns equivalent pitching events so the coach can compare body position and rotational behaviour even when the athlete and reference move at different speeds.

This separates two different coaching questions: when something happened in the real pitch, and how the body was organised at the equivalent phase of the movement.

Full-body analysis connects drive-leg contribution, lead-foot plant, stride timing, pelvis and trunk transfer, shoulder-line behaviour, arm layback and wrist-speed build into one ordered pitching sequence. The report highlights the parts of that chain that are most useful for coach review and places them against the selected baseline.

This gives the coach a way to review the delivery holistically: not simply whether an arm metric was high or low, but what the lower body and trunk were doing before that result appeared.

Lead-foot plant is extracted as a separate STRIDE event. STRIDE does not replace P2: it gives the lower body its own timing authority, while P2 remains the upper-body throwing-action marker.

That lets the coach compare lower-body plant timing directly against the upper-body P-marker sequence and ask whether the delivery is transferring from the ground up in the intended order.

Kineologist derives motion-based muscle contribution and sequencing proxies from the recorded movement. These are not EMG measurements. The system identifies key sequencing events, shown as M events, to provide a repeatable view of how the movement chain develops through the pitch.

Within the full-body PITCH pipeline, the relevant lower-body M-event signal is used to extract the STRIDE event and refine automatic detection around lead-foot plant. The wider M-event sequence then gives the coach another layer for reviewing how lower-body drive, trunk transfer, shoulder activity and the throwing arm progress through the delivery.