This report preserves detailed technical pitching evidence, comparison authorities and interpretation boundaries for scientific review.
CURRENT-PITCH PRIORITIES
1) Mechanical objective: address the measured pelvis-to-shoulder-to-arm sequencing pattern without changing unrelated mechanics.
Coaching action: Rehearse the pelvis-to-shoulder-to-arm sequence at controlled effort, preserving clear proximal-to-distal progression without forcing range.
Evidence to recheck: Review pelvis and shoulder rotation together with the exact arm-event evidence that caused the sequencing finding.
Boundary: motion-sequence intervention; not a force or medical prescription.
2) Mechanical objective: address the measured early wrist-speed ramp timing pattern without changing unrelated mechanics.
Coaching action: Rehearse a progressive elbow-to-forearm-to-wrist acceleration sequence at controlled effort rather than rushing the wrist-speed build.
Evidence to recheck: Recheck the wrist-speed-build peak against the subject’s own peak wrist-speed event and inspect the surrounding arm sequence.
Boundary: motion-sequence intervention; not a force or medical prescription.
3) Mechanical objective: address the measured shoulder-line rotation timing pattern without changing unrelated mechanics.
Coaching action: Rehearse pelvis-to-shoulder rotation timing at controlled effort and confirm shoulder-line rotation is not arriving late relative to the distal-arm event.
Evidence to recheck: Review the shoulder-line rotation peak against the exact distal-arm timing event and inspect the associated pelvis/shoulder curves.
Boundary: motion-sequence intervention; not a force or medical prescription.
4) Mechanical objective: address the measured kinematic throwing-arm proxy indicators pattern without changing unrelated mechanics.
Coaching action: Rehearse the throwing-arm sequence at controlled effort, then recheck the specific kinematic loading-proxy conditions that fired.
Evidence to recheck: Review every causal loading-proxy condition in Current Evidence at its exact frame or event; do not treat the proxy as a direct elbow-load measurement.
Boundary: motion-sequence intervention; not a force or medical prescription.
5) Mechanical objective: address the measured elevated elbow / upper-arm orientation proxy pattern without changing unrelated mechanics.
Coaching action: Rehearse the P2 arm shape at controlled effort and check whether the elevated-elbow pattern persists without forcing a target position.
Evidence to recheck: Recheck elbow height, humerus orientation and the exact persistence evidence around P2 together with the 3D pose.
Boundary: motion-sequence intervention; not a force or medical prescription.
6) Mechanical objective: address the measured late forearm-direction lag timing pattern without changing unrelated mechanics.
Coaching action: Rehearse the forearm-and-wrist sequence at controlled effort through the late acceleration/release window without forcing a target angle.
Evidence to recheck: Recheck the forearm-direction lag evidence and its exact timing around P3/P4 together with wrist-speed and elbow-motion curves.
Boundary: motion-sequence intervention; not a force or medical prescription.
COMPARATIVE REVIEW POINTS
1) Review point: The largest observed throwing-side local-rotation difference from the selected reference was 60.8° at throwing upper arm in P4 (frame 112). This is a descriptive reference difference, not a stand-alone indication that the subject is mechanically wrong. 3 additional throwing-side joint difference(s) are listed in the detailed selected-reference joint-pose review.
throwing shoulder: peak local-rotation difference 30.0° at P3→P4 (frame 110); authority: phase-locked pose.
throwing upper arm: peak local-rotation difference 60.8° at P4 (frame 112); authority: phase-locked pose.
throwing forearm: peak local-rotation difference 29.9° at P3→P4 (frame 110); authority: phase-locked pose.
LeftCarpalRadiusOffset: peak local-rotation difference 53.9° at P3→P4 (frame 109); authority: phase-locked pose.
HIGH PRIORITY
THE PELVIS→SHOULDER→ARM SEQUENCE SHOWS SHOULDER-LINE ROTATION ARRIVING LATE RELATIVE TO THE ARM EVENTS
Analysis
Pelvis-to-shoulder-to-arm sequencing
What this means
Shoulder-line rotation occurred late relative to the forearm-lag event; lag magnitude or persistence may increase severity.
Current evidence
2 conditions contributed to this SEVERE finding: Shoulder-rotation timing relative to forearm-lag peak: 0.196 normalized pitch time; rule threshold greater than 0.080 normalized pitch time. Peak forearm-direction lag: 169.8°; rule threshold at least 75.0°.
Comparison authority: direct current-pitch evidence.
Evidence quality: Good.
Boundary: Kinematic sequencing proxy; not a diagnosis or direct joint-load measurement.
NEEDS ATTENTION
WRIST-SPEED RAMP PEAK OCCURRED EARLY BEFORE PEAK WRIST SPEED
Analysis
Early wrist-speed ramp timing
What this means
The wrist-speed build peaked early relative to the subject’s own maximum wrist-speed event.
Current evidence
Wrist-speed-build timing relative to peak wrist speed: -0.125 normalized pitch time; rule threshold at most -0.100 normalized pitch time. frame 91
Comparison authority: direct current-pitch evidence.
Evidence quality: Good.
Boundary: Signal-shape timing proxy, not a direct tissue-loading measure.
NEEDS ATTENTION
SHOULDER-LINE ROTATION PEAKS LATE RELATIVE TO THE DISTAL-ARM EVENTS
Analysis
Shoulder-line rotation timing
What this means
The shoulder-line rotation peak occurred late relative to the forearm-lag peak.
Current evidence
Shoulder-rotation timing relative to forearm-lag peak: 0.196 normalized pitch time; rule threshold greater than 0.080 normalized pitch time. frame 80
Comparison authority: direct current-pitch evidence.
Evidence quality: Good.
Boundary: Performance sequencing descriptor; not a direct loading or injury measure.
NEEDS ATTENTION
THROWING-ARM KINEMATIC PROXY INDICATORS WERE ELEVATED
Analysis
Kinematic throwing-arm proxy indicators
What this means
Multiple arm-timing / speed conditions contributed to this finding.
Current evidence
3 conditions contributed to this MODERATE finding: Peak elbow angular speed: 1873.0°/s; rule threshold at least 1800.0°/s. frame 96 Release-window elbow angular speed: 1117.8°/s; rule threshold at least 900.0°/s. release_window Peak forearm-direction lag: 169.8°; rule threshold at least 70.0°. frame 58
Comparison authority: direct current-pitch evidence.
Evidence quality: Good.
Boundary: Kinematic proxy only; it does not measure elbow valgus torque, tissue load or injury risk.
WORTH NOTING
PERSISTENT ELEVATED-ELBOW / UPPER-ARM ORIENTATION AT P2
Analysis
Elevated elbow / upper-arm orientation proxy
What this means
The elevated throwing-elbow / upper-arm orientation persisted through part of P2.
Current evidence
P2 elevated upper-arm persistence: 16.4%; rule threshold at least 15.0%. P2
Comparison authority: direct current-pitch evidence.
Evidence quality: Good.
Boundary: Shape/timing review proxy only. It is not an established injury predictor or diagnosis.
WORTH NOTING
THE ANGLE BETWEEN FOREARM DIRECTION AND WRIST-VELOCITY DIRECTION REMAINED ELEVATED LATE INTO ACCELERATION/RELEASE
Analysis
Late forearm-direction lag timing
What this means
Forearm-direction lag remained elevated close to release.
Current evidence
Release-window forearm-direction lag: 93.7°; rule threshold at least 75.0°. frame 58
Comparison authority: direct current-pitch evidence.
Evidence quality: Good.
Boundary: Kinematic direction/timing proxy; not shoulder external rotation, elbow valgus torque or diagnosis.