Kineologist HTML Report

Gait + Balance Coach Report

Take: dataset-1_walk_childish_001(1)

Coach Summary

  • The selected walking window contained 4 left and 4 right steps, with 4 left and 3 right completed strides.
  • Initial-contact alternation and stride structure provided good engineering evidence for this window.
  • Step-time asymmetry was 4.3%, within the current engineering monitor band.
  • Stance-time difference was 2.2 percentage points, within the current engineering monitor band.
  • The window did not contain enough complete strides on both sides for fully reportable variability analysis.
  • Trunk–pelvis relative orientation excursion was 15.8° (MILD under the current engineering bands).

Capture and Evidence Quality

  • Window: 4.67 s @ 30.00 fps
  • Accepted gait events: 16
  • Rejected non-gait events: 28
  • Initial contacts: L 5, R 4
  • Toe-offs: L 4, R 3
  • Completed steps: L 4, R 4
  • Completed strides: L 4, R 3
  • Evidence grade: GOOD
  • Initial-contact alternation: 100.0%
  • Valid stride structure: 100.0%
  • Fallback-event fraction: 12.5%

Step Timing and Left/Right Symmetry

  • Left mean step time: 0.567 s (17.00 frames; n=4)
  • Right mean step time: 0.592 s (17.75 frames; n=4)
  • Signed left–right step-time difference: -4.32%
  • Absolute step-time asymmetry: 4.32%
  • Status: Within the current engineering monitor band (< 5.0%).

Stride Timing and Variability

  • Left mean stride time: 1.158 s (34.75 frames; n=4)
  • Right mean stride time: 1.133 s (34.00 frames; n=3)
  • Left stride-time variability: 4.32% CV — exploratory only; fewer than 5 strides (n=4).
  • Right stride-time variability: 0.00% CV — exploratory only; fewer than 5 strides (n=3).
  • Status: Not reportable for this window

Stance and Swing Timing

  • Left stance proportion: 54.63% (n=4)
  • Right stance proportion: 56.86% (n=3)
  • Left swing proportion: 45.37%
  • Right swing proportion: 43.14%
  • Absolute stance-time difference: 2.23 percentage points
  • Status: Within the current engineering monitor band (< 5.0 percentage points).
  • This is a kinematic initial-contact-to-toe-off timing proxy, not a force, pressure, loading, or plantar-pressure measure.

Trunk–Pelvis Movement Quality

  • Trunk–pelvis relative orientation excursion: 15.81°
  • Reference joints: Hips → Chest
  • Valid stride windows: 7
  • Status: MILD
  • This wrap-safe thorax-relative-to-pelvis descriptor is a movement-quality proxy, not a clinical balance diagnosis.

Current Rule Findings

  • MILD: Thorax movement relative to the pelvis was elevated across stride windows. This wrap-safe orientation descriptor is a movement-quality proxy, not a clinical balance diagnosis. [trunk_sway_proxy]
  • INFO: Robust baseline-relative z-scores were not calculated because a repeated, protocol-matched baseline distribution was not available. [baseline_not_available]

Selected Baseline Comparison

  • trunk forward/back displacement proxy:
- Subject: 3.0084 cm
- Selected baseline: -0.3216 cm
- Difference (subject − baseline): 3.3300 cm
- Relative percentage not shown because the selected baseline mean is near zero or crosses zero; the absolute difference is more interpretable.
- Development band: High deviation from selected baseline
  • trunk side-to-side displacement proxy:
- Subject: -0.1218 cm
- Selected baseline: 0.1246 cm
- Difference (subject − baseline): -0.2464 cm
- Relative percentage not shown because the selected baseline mean is near zero or crosses zero; the absolute difference is more interpretable.
- Development band: High deviation from selected baseline
  • head forward/back displacement proxy:
- Subject: 5.5086 cm
- Selected baseline: 1.9041 cm
- Difference (subject − baseline): 3.6045 cm
- Relative difference: +189.31%
- Development band: High deviation from selected baseline
  • head side-to-side displacement proxy:
- Subject: -0.6196 cm
- Selected baseline: -0.8075 cm
- Difference (subject − baseline): 0.1880 cm
- Relative difference: +23.28%
- Development band: High deviation from selected baseline
  • left foot clearance proxy:
- Subject: -76.9544 cm
- Selected baseline: -72.7534 cm
- Difference (subject − baseline): -4.2009 cm
- Relative difference: -5.77%
- Development band: Notable deviation from selected baseline
  • right foot clearance proxy:
- Subject: -77.6500 cm
- Selected baseline: -73.6686 cm
- Difference (subject − baseline): -3.9814 cm
- Relative difference: -5.40%
- Development band: Notable deviation from selected baseline

Practical Review Priorities

  • Review thorax–pelvis movement across the same stride windows and confirm whether it is repeatable.

Interpretation Boundary

  • These are descriptive movement-quality and selected-baseline differences from recorded motion data.
  • They are not a diagnosis, fall-risk detector, neurological screen, or clinical impairment classification.
  • Current thresholds are transparent engineering starting bands pending external biomechanical validation.

Muscle Contribution Highlights

Note: These values are motion-derived muscle-contribution proxies inferred from kinematic channels. They are not EMG measurements. Peak contribution values were saturated across the compared groups, so mean contribution and duty duration are more informative for this take.

  • Lower mean contribution: Left Leg (-40.1%), Spine (-35.4%), Right Leg (-22.3%), Pelvis / Trunk (-16.9%)
  • Lower duty duration: Left Leg (-30.0pp), Right Leg (-13.3pp), Spine (-13.2pp), Pelvis / Trunk (-6.1pp)

Largest individual mean/duty shifts

  • RFINGER deltoid: mean -32.8%, duty >50% -38.6pp
  • LARM forearm flex: mean -24.7%, duty >50% -9.3pp
  • LFINGER forearm flex: mean -24.7%, duty >50% -9.3pp
  • SPINE oblique: mean -23.9%, duty >50% -10.0pp
  • LFINGER deltoid: mean -14.8%, duty >50% -12.1pp